W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2004

Re: URIQA, schema namespaces etc.

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 04:17:34 -0500 (EST)
To: Benja Fallenstein <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>
Cc: danny666@virgilio.it, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0403170415550.5021@homer.w3.org>

So given thet the Dublin core terms are also defined in Spanish, how would I
get that version? And who authorises it?



On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Benja Fallenstein wrote:

>Hash: SHA1
>Danny Ayers wrote:
>| Just a thought - what is/should be considered the Concise Bounded
>| Resource Description if the URI identifies an RDF schema/OWL ontology
>| namespace?
>| e.g. what should an MGET on http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ return?
>IMHO the definition of "concise bounded description" is quite clear and
>schemas/ontologies are no special case. The concise bounded description
>of the term above would be
><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
><dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Dublin Core Element Set v1.1 namespace
>providing access to its content by means of an RDF Schema</dc:title>
>as far as I can see.
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2004 04:17:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:50 UTC