W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?

From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@asemantics.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:09:21 +0100
Message-Id: <F7208B6D-72E7-11D8-8408-000A95CDA38A@asemantics.com>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, David Powell <djpowell@djpowell.net>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>


>    (3) if the resource itself is represented in RDF, HTML, JPEG, or
>        another metadata friendly format, you can/should include at
>        least the metadata-location (and maybe some other metadata) in
>        the representation itself.

XMP et.al. should not be underestimated.

> (Of course your location *might* involved a ".meta" appended to the
> name, but I would never assume such a thing.  :-)

Aye - but I have to admit - after arguing strongly once upon a time
for 'META' in Apache/NCSA, and after having mod_meta in apache
- we never really used it all that much.

> Do you have an everything-worked-out tutorial on how to use DDDS like
> this?   (I read some of the DDDS RFC's long ago.  I'm looking for
> something rather different here.)
>
Work in progress at

Quick guide:
	http://foaf-demo.asemantics.com/qg.html

Dw.
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2004 18:09:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 18 February 2014 13:20:07 UTC