W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2004

RE: rdf parse-able

From: Keith Bohnenberger <kbohnenberger@mcdonaldbradley.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:35:36 -0500
To: "'www-rdf-interest'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000c01c406ac$f37af640$8c01a8c0@MBIVKB.COM>

Dave, Jeremy, thanks for the tips.

Right now we are experimenting with both approaches (RDF parsable XML;
XSLT to RDF/XML) or a combination of the two perhaps.

Any further advice or links to examples of both approaches would be
great appreciated.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 6:22 AM
> To: Dave Beckett
> Cc: Keith Bohnenberger; www-rdf-interest
> Subject: Re: rdf parse-able
> 
> 
> Personally I think the approach of XSLT-ing your XML documents into
> appropriate RDF/XML is likely to be a better fit.
> 
> Issues that cannot be adequately addressed in other ways include:
> 
> - closed world versus open world.
> - defaults
> 
> 
> The XSLT you write should make explicit any implicit semantic
assumptions
> in your XML format. Typically your application will be happy with
defaults,
> and with various closed world assumptions, which should be made
explicit
> for interchange with other unknown apps on the semantic web.
> 
> Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2004 09:35:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 18 February 2014 13:20:06 UTC