W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2004

Re: HTTP Methods

From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@asemantics.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:33:53 +0100
Message-Id: <42C1FC66-71B5-11D8-B93F-000A95CDA38A@asemantics.com>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, "ext Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>


On Mar 9, 2004, at 11:24 AM, Patrick Stickler wrote:

>
> On Mar 09, 2004, at 12:13, ext Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>
>>> they are) then fine, but ultimately, if you want data 
>>> (representations
>>> or descriptions) then HTTP is the best game in town.
>>
>> :-) :-) Well - _that_ is a point I do not quite share; there are 
>> actually other
>> protocols out there ;-) :-) which do a fine job for specialist 
>> communities.
>
> Note that I did not say that HTTP was the *only* game in town. I said
> it was the *best* game in town.
>
Funny that - heard a MQ series guy this morning say much the same; and 
the PingTel phone
on my desk has this big SIP desire except when it does LDAP for the 
number ;-)

But point taken (and this is a w3 mailing list - so a certain level of 
nearsightnessness is a good thing!).

Dw.
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2004 05:35:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 18 February 2014 13:20:06 UTC