- From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:46:12 -0700
- To: <jld@club-internet.fr>
- Cc: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, "Adrian Walker" <adrianw@snet.net>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <semanticweb@yahoogroups.com>
> which ones duplicates this thread? I already replied to you privately, off-list, yesterday with a pointer to one such discussion which just occurred this week. Please don't blame other people for your own ignorance. If you can demonstrate that you have put in some honest effort, beyond a single puny Google search, and wild accusations that people are somehow lying by claiming that your questions lack novelty, people would be more inclined to help you fill in the gaps. > My "informed opinion" is that the Semantic Web > fails on one of it's major goals: Interoperability > > Can you give me your "informed opinion" about this? I contributed probably ten messages to the particular thread I mentioned to you, which would go a long way toward explaining *my* opinion on interop. And that is just this week. I would suggest that you reframe your opinion, since it's rather meaningless as stands. SemWeb interop has some successes, and some failures. Discussing where the failures are, and why; and where the successes are, and why, is much more interesting than making such absolutist generalizations. All generalizations are lies. The "semantic web" community is extremely reflective and self-critical; I would suggest you lurk for awhile and take the time to understand the contours and dynamics of the many diverse semweb opinions before you decide that you're doing us a favor by throwing random insults.
Received on Friday, 18 June 2004 14:46:31 UTC