Re: WG: Cases in the new specification of RDF Schema

On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 12:13:30 +0200, Kianoush Eshaghi wrote:
> > 2. A Property would own multiple domains and rangs. It would like such
> > as following:
> >
> > <rdf:Property rdf:about="a">
> > 	<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#A"/>
> > 	<rdfs:range    rdf:resource="#B"/>
> > 	<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#C"/>
> > 	<rdfs:range    rdf:resource="#D"/>
> > 	...
> > 	...
> > </rdf:Property>
> 
> And this, but it probably doesnt mean what you think it does. It would
> make anything that was in the domain of 'a' a member of #A and #C.
> 
> My RDF Schema should assert that the domain of 'a' must contain only
> members of #A and #C, and the range of 'a' must contain only members of
> #B and #D.

Thats open to interpretation, most implemntations will place objects in
the range into those classes, rather than fail if they are not.

- Steve 

Received on Friday, 11 June 2004 06:19:25 UTC