- From: Pete Johnston <p.johnston@ukoln.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 15:05:53 +0100
- To: 'Richard' <listserve@richardlennox.net>, 'www-rdf-interest' <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <002401c44973$e21f1110$2392268a@ulpcpj>
Hi Richard, > I have considered this syntax however, there is the > requirement that contributors of different types still need > to be listed in some order hence my syntax. For some reason > using rdf:Resource parses with both the W3C RDF Validators I think the validator just treats it as some unknown property, but it does generate a warning message e.g. Warning: {W103} Creating statement for unknown RDF property: 'rdf:Resource'.[Line = 16, Column = 43] (from validating your http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~ceerdl/Dissertation/example5.rdf ) > and the SWI-Prolog RDF Validator however incorrect it is > which has confused me. > > Perhaps I am trying to do too much with RDF? > > I need to say in > the simplest way possible that there is a list of contributors: > > 1 marcrel:aut #XYZ > 2 marcrel:ill #ABC > > such that they point to a foaf:Person. OK, in that case, as bib:contributors and marcrel:(xyz) are both properties of your resource of type bib:Citable, and it's the contributors you wish to order, I think you'd need to use them as distinct properties, something like bib.xml attached (which generates the graph attached as bib.png). > Can someone help me out? With the deadline looming I really > would need to fix this in 24 hours. Pete
Attachments
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2004 10:04:54 UTC