- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:50:10 -0400
- To: Simon Price <simon.price@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Actually, I think I'll disagree with myself before anyone else does.
> Taking Dan's point, the ordering could well be IFP > no URI/IFP > URI
> because the URI is in no way a property of the described object whereas
> all other properties are.
Why isn't something's URI an IFP property of the thing? TimBL calls
that property log:uri, I think. For a while, I generalized it
slightly to u:uname [1].
-- sandro
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/12/uname/
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2004 16:46:30 UTC