- From: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:41:34 +0100
- To: "www-rdf-interest@w3.org" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Quoting Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>: > <geo:lat rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double" > > 42.4 </geo:lat> > > then this goes to the heart of my question. I'd expect that to treated the > same as: > > <geo:lat rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double" > >42.4</geo:lat> > > But I think the mere fact of being datatyped is insufficient to determine > the correct whitespace handling, as the xsd:string case shows. I think it's sufficient to determine correct whitespace handling when being processed by something that understands the datatypes. An RDF processor that does not understand the datatypes would have to preserve the whitespace as the more conservative choice, however if it later passed the value and the datatype URI to a process that did understand datatypes then the whitespace handling could be performed at that stage. -- Jon Hanna <http://www.hackcraft.net/> "…if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's probably not a ConceptualWork about a duck." - Mark Baker
Received on Monday, 12 July 2004 05:41:36 UTC