On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:35:35AM -0800, Joshua Allen wrote: > Furthermore, the DNS portion of the URI is as much about > delineating naming authority as it is about locating a port for GET > operations. Yup. IMO, the confusion stems primarily (solely?) from the fact that the same string is used for both purposes. But that's not a requirement of the architecture, it's just a bit easier to manage. It doesn't mean that we couldn't have defined the http URI scheme like so; http://ExampleCo/foo/bar and in the definition of the scheme, define a transform that takes that string and converts it to a hostname ("www.example.com") when dereferencing the URI. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.caReceived on Friday, 23 January 2004 13:09:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:14 GMT