Hi Everyone, As part of a taxonomy framework, we will be linking taxonomies lexically by requiring each term to be mapped to a WordNet synonym or synset. As a start, I created an XSD schema and instance that follows the striped syntax and is thus also parseable as RDF. Here is a partial sample instance: <wn:Word xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' xmlns:wn='http://www.daconta.net/wn#' rdf:ID='dog' xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.daconta.net/wn# Word.xsd" > <wn:partsOfSpeech rdf:parseType='Collection'> <wn:PartOfSpeech wn:type='verb'> <wn:concepts rdf:parseType='Collection'> <wn:Concept rdf:ID='_1943890'> <wn:definition>go after with the intent to catch; "The policeman chased the mugger down the alley"; "the dog chased the rabbit"</wn:definition> <wn:relations rdf:parseType='Collection'> <wn:Relation wn:type='hypernym' wn:tgt='_1942900'/> ... <wn:Relation wn:type='hyponym' wn:tgt='_1946245'/> </wn:relations> <wn:synonyms rdf:parseType='Collection'> <wn:Synonym wn:lemma='chase_after'/> <wn:Synonym wn:lemma='give_chase'/> </wn:synonyms> </wn:Concept> </wn:concepts> </wn:PartOfSpeech> . If you are interested in playing around with this, there is a schema, test program and simple web service at http://www.daconta.net/project_folder/WordnetMetamodel.html . I have two questions for this group . 1. Would it be better to leave this as RDF or create an OWL ontology for the Wordnet metamodel. 2. How would you handle wordnet addressing? In other words, a link from a Topic to a Wordnet Concept (aka synset) or Synonym. Another aspect of this would be how closely wordnet relations, map to XTM associations and OWL relations. Thanks for any feedback, - Mike ---------------------------- Michael C. Daconta Chief Scientist, APG, McDonald Bradley, Inc. www.daconta.netReceived on Thursday, 22 January 2004 16:55:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:14 GMT