I have been looking at RDF to help solve the problem of managing research group web pages.[1] I know RDF is designed or better suited for high level inferences, but I am still allured by the hype. Initially I am looking to use RDF as a format to store data in. Edited by researchers by hand, using perhaps N3 notation and maintained in CVS. From that RDF, I will construct a script that can generate the XHTML: http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/hendry/work/nodes/template/pp/index.en.html This method is attractive as I am faced with the above template that might change. For example "releases" might be renamed to publications. Or there might be some re-ordering at some point. If I have all the data in XHTML, it would prove a pain to edit all the group's web pages. Ideally I would just change the (transformation) script. N3 also at first glances, seems pleasant enough to conduct translations in. Is this a reasonable approach? Should I be using XML and XSL? Something else? RDF seems to more useful if I had to remap some vocabulary and might help show as an added bonus some interesting research group relations between the mess here: http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/group/ If someone could offer some advice and direction, I would be very grateful. [1] http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/hendry/work/nodes/template/latex/report.pdfReceived on Monday, 19 January 2004 04:32:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:14 GMT