- From: Nick Knouf <nknouf@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:16:35 -0500
- To: Pete Johnston <p.johnston@ukoln.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> It was quite an eye-opener to see the large number of "variant" URIs > deployed for common terms (either because specs had changed over time > or > because of typos in XML, "#" in place of "/" in XML namespace names, > and > so on), as well as the range of "locally" minted terms. As a followup, I was wondering what people consider to be best practices when using a persistent URL service like purl.org. For my bibTeX in OWL schema [1] the PURL for the namespace is http://purl.oclc.org/NET/nknouf/ns/bibtex That PURL, when resolved (it goes to the schema definition), already has the # appended. On the other hand, I could leave the # sign off of the PURL and the namespace would be http://purl.oclc.org/NET/nknouf/ns/bibtex# Does anyone have feelings one way versus the other? Cheers, Nick Knouf [1] http://visus.mit.edu/bibtex/0.1/ > Pete > ------- > Pete Johnston > Research Officer (Interoperability) > UKOLN, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK > tel: +44 (0)1225 383619 fax: +44 (0)1225 386838 > mailto:p.johnston@ukoln.ac.uk > http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/p.johnston/ > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2004 11:25:18 UTC