W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2004

Re: Graph naming?

From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:43:14 +0100
Message-ID: <006f01c3fac3$01a393d0$c300000a@caliente>
To: "Graham Klyne" <gk@ninebynine.org>
Cc: "rdf-interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>


> Is this conceptually broken in any way I haven't noticed?

This approach would limit the number of named graphs per file to one,
no?

Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2004 05:43:25 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dave Beckett: "ANNOUNCEMENT: Redland RDF Application Framework 0.9.16"
Previous message: Graham Klyne: "Graph naming?"
In reply to: Graham Klyne: "Graph naming?"
Next in thread: Jos De_Roo: "Re: Graph naming?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:15 GMT