- From: DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:46:48 -0500
- To: "'Victor Lindesay'" <victor@schemaweb.info>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Sure--if they represented the same thing, I wouldn't have to worry about picking between them. I was trying to determine which of the two options is preferable. Bob -----Original Message----- From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Victor Lindesay Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 1:26 PM To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org Subject: RE: pound sign vs. slash as final URI delimiter Bob wrote: > Let's say I have a namespace > identified by the > URI http://www.example.com/pathname. To identify the name foo > from that > namespace, what are the pros and cons of identifying it with a URI of > http://www.example.com/pathname/foo as opposed to > http://www.example.com/pathname#foo? Forgive me. I'm wearing XML specs. But for our NCName 'foo', isn't the namespace for http://www.example.com/pathname/foo http://www.example.com/pathname/ and the namespace for: http://www.example.com/pathname#foo http://www.example.com/pathname# Two foos surely? 'URI references which identify namespaces are considered identical when they are exactly the same character-for-character.' http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 14:46:56 UTC