W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2004

Re: hiding RDF

From: Benja Fallenstein <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:45:39 +0200
Message-ID: <402CE313.8000308@gmx.de>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Newman <andrew@pisoftware.com>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeremy Carroll wrote:
| Yes but ...
|
| Fixing something in emacs is one thing, using emacs as your principle
| editor is another ...
|
| Hmmm perhaps I should stop digging.
|
| TriX by having a clear and simple mapping onto the graph is suited for
| editing of data, if not for data input itself.

That, and if you write a custom XSLT stylesheet, it's also a powerful
tool for data entry itself. I think it's great for this on all points. ;-)

Whether people actually use emacs or a dedicated RDF editor is then
entirely up to them, as it should be.

Cheers,
- - Benja
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFALOMTUvR5J6wSKPMRAn/jAJ9aS+QEgo7sKOCKMgLaSnFcwSeVnwCgjd8X
HGdJqgMlEoMSan1ohw7yzjg=
=q8gW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 13 February 2004 09:45:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:58 UTC