W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2004

Re: RDF Triples in XML, named graphs

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:33:53 +0000
Message-ID: <402BC711.8020206@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Bob MacGregor <macgregor@ISI.EDU>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org



Bob MacGregor wrote:

> In a practical sense, that means that every TriX document should
> contain at least two graphs, the second one commenting on the first.

One could have a convention where the first graph is always asserted, and 
may simply be a single statement that the second graph is not asserted ...

(Distinguishing the first allows more than two graphs).

Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2004 13:36:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:58 UTC