W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2004

Re: RDF Triples in XML, named graphs

From: Benja Fallenstein <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:47:38 +0200
Message-ID: <402A94EA.2070804@gmx.de>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sandro Hawke wrote:
| Why use XML as the syntax for describing triples instead of RDF/XML?
|
| (That is, why not just say [admit?] you're proposing a reification
| vocabulary?)

Hmmm? Their paper proposes a solution to the RDF serialization problem
- -- RDF/XML is too complex, but any simple solution is too simple because
for some applications it makes the RDF too difficult to write. That's
very different from proposing a reification vocabulary...

Cheers,
- - Benja
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAKpTqUvR5J6wSKPMRAg+ZAKDSMR9SzXYWz7ypP2YYP9Ajqoc6jQCgzDwO
hQYYTMemyPC0LcGLp/bwBIk=
=UbZF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2004 15:47:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:58 UTC