W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > December 2004

Re: Time-sensitive resources using RDF?

From: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:09:22 -0500
Message-ID: <41C9D471.5050408@acm.org>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
CC: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org

While people are at it, I notice that there is another spec from the 
Multimodal Interaction Activity that could use a look.  The Extensible 
Multi-Modal Annotations (EMMA) http://www.w3.org/TR/emma/ working draft 
says that it provides "an annotative syntax derived from RDF...". 
However, that's the only mention of RDF in the document, including the 
references.  It would be nice if the relationship were made more explicit.

EMMA is also cited as "a target data format for the semantic 
interpretation [for speech recognition] specification being developed in 
the Voice Browser Activity" (the Semantic Interpretation for Speech 
Recognition specification is at 
http://www.w3.org/TR/semantic-interpretation/ and is also in Last Call).

Given that the word "semantic" always seems to set off alarms wherever 
it appears (and probably ought to!), I hope people in both the Voice 
Browser Activity and the Semantic Web Activity are working on their 
stories to explain the relationship between "semantic" in these two 
contexts, especially since neither the semantic interpretation document 
nor the Voice Browser Activity page at http://www.w3.org/Voice/ seem to 
suggest that there is one (ahem!).


Dan Brickley wrote:
> * Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> [2004-12-22 15:01+0000]
>>A quick glance at this thread indicates that you haven't yet mentioned:
>>Dynamic Properties Framework (DPF)
>>    22 November 2004, David Raggett, Rafah A. Hosn, Sailesh Sathish, 
>>Keith Waters
>>    Last Call Ends 10 January 2005
>>While this is not in RDF it is about time-sensitive properties of 
>>resources - hmmm is that the same as time-sensitive resources??
> Oh wow, that's in Last Call already. Thanks for the reminder!
> I'm sure they'd appreciate reviews from RDF folks. Also if anyone 
> has time to try XSLT GRDDLing it into RDF, that would be a valuable 
> exercise...
> Dan
Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2004 20:28:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:54 UTC