W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > December 2004

Re: ROR - Resources of a Resource

From: Laurian Gridinoc <laurian@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:42:17 +0200
Message-ID: <9782e3350412201542371884da@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dom Vonarburg <dom@rorweb.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org

Hello,

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:47:22 -0500, Dom Vonarburg <dom@rorweb.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the info. Do you have an RDF example of the use of criteria? 

The idea would be:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns="http://example.net/rep#">

<rdfs:Resource rdf:about="http://www.example.net/">
   <representedBy>
       <rdf:Alt>

          <!-- Representations subClassOf rdf:Alt -->
          <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://example.net/rep#Representations" />

          <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.example.net/en/" />
          <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.example.net/jp/" />

          <decidedBy
rdf:resource="http://example.net/rep#LanguageNegociation" />

       </rdf:Alt>
   </representedBy>
</rdfs:Resource>

</rdf:RDF>

A resource holds a bag of alternate representations, and a selection
criterion attached to the bag.

The above example validates, but I think it's a bit wrong, anyway the
graph shows the idea.

> More types of relationships will definitely be added to ROR.  

A bag to allow `direct' resource composition (not by the property
resourceOf), would be helpful, such that on that bag other statements
can be made. I doubt that rdf:SeeAlso can be used for this, it might
be too generic.

Cheers,
-- 
Laurian Gridinoc
Chief Developer
GRAPEFRUIT
www.grapefruit.ro
Received on Monday, 20 December 2004 23:42:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:12 GMT