W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > December 2004

Re: facts about web ontology languages

From: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:51:13 +0000
Message-Id: <52AFB5BB-4C90-11D9-AD65-000A95D338FC@reading.ac.uk>
To: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

> This is second hand (via Jeremy Carroll), but I understand Herman ter 
> Horst presented a paper [1] showing that RDF and RDFS are decidable, 
> and further that they are decidable in polynomial time (which is 
> cheaper than DLs). I believe this also holds for RDFS + some bits of 
> OWL (fp, ifp, inv, sameAs ? i.e. not the restrictions), but with 
> intensional semantics.
> As for OWL Full I don't know of any papers showing it isn't decidable. 
> Yet.
> I'll let more knowledgeable people dive in at this point.

Totally disregarding the point about being "knowledgeable" (:)), I 
think one of the plus points that was made about OWL-DL and OWL Lite 
being DLs was the ability to use existing DL reasoners (such as RACER) 
--- i.e. OWL Full may be decidable, but no-one has written a complete 
reasoner for it.

Interesting paper pointer though... I shall have to read that!

Received on Sunday, 12 December 2004 22:51:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:54 UTC