W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2004

RE: I need a RDFS Parser/Validator

From: Fink, Clayton R. <Clayton.Fink@jhuapl.edu>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:06:55 -0400
Message-ID: <0F5AC32D8E455545AD0349BA8400A3CA1AA1B0@aplesliberty.dom1.jhuapl.edu>
To: "Www-Rdf-Interest (E-mail)" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

Wouldn't vowlidator do the trick?

-----Original Message-----
From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
[mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Mithun Sheshagiri
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 4:27 PM
To: Kianoush Eshaghi
Cc: 'RDF interesting groupe'
Subject: Re: I need a RDFS Parser/Validator

        You might want to look at OWLJessKB [1]. You need 
Jess<http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/jess/> and Jena 
<http://jena.sourceforge.net/>to use this. Primarily used for reasoning 
but also has few rules that validate RDFS schema. Ontology API of Jena 
can be used for generating reports. You can also write arbitrarily rules 
and queries in Jess to extract information if you use OWLJessKB.


[1] "OWLJessKB is a description logic reasoner for the W3C's Ontology 
Web Language [1 
<http://edge.cs.drexel.edu/assemblies/software/owljesskb/#links>]. The 
semantics of the language is implemented using Jess, the Java Expert 
System Shell [2 
Kianoush Eshaghi wrote:

>I am looking for a appropriate RDFS validator, which is able to have the
>following abilities:
>1. It should validate a defined RDF vocabulary (RDFS), whether it
>satisfies the RDF Schema specification, which has been recommended by
>2. It should give a report about the classes and properties.
>3. It would be nice, if the validator could validate some instances
>against a given RDF vocabulary (RDFS).
>freundliche Gruesse / best regards
>Dipl.-Ing. Kianoush Eshaghi     T +43 1 74040-652
>METADAT - The Architect for Knowledge Networks
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2004 21:10:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:52 UTC