W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2004

Re: Reification - whats best practice?

From: Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:43:35 +0200
Message-ID: <413223D7.4020709@gnowsis.com>
To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
CC: Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch, dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk, www-rdf-interest@w3.org

>>>Quads are also a bad standard since they
>>>mean different things to different people; i.e. not a standard.
>>>      
>>>
>>That's precisely why they need to be standardized, to ensure 
>>that they 
>>mean the same things to different people :-)
>>    
>>
>
>+1
>
>And my recommendation would be that the fourth component of 
>a quad would be a graph name (which also would be optional).
>  
>

+1
that is super simple and compatible with f,e, rdf-gateway.
or ?

who would be the person to implement/standardize it?

who will hack this in Jena?

cheers
Leo
Received on Sunday, 29 August 2004 18:43:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:57 UTC