>>>Quads are also a bad standard since they >>>mean different things to different people; i.e. not a standard. >>> >>> >>That's precisely why they need to be standardized, to ensure >>that they >>mean the same things to different people :-) >> >> > >+1 > >And my recommendation would be that the fourth component of >a quad would be a graph name (which also would be optional). > > +1 that is super simple and compatible with f,e, rdf-gateway. or ? who would be the person to implement/standardize it? who will hack this in Jena? cheers LeoReceived on Sunday, 29 August 2004 18:43:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:08 GMT