Re: Reification - whats best practice?

Bob MacGregor wrote:

> So where is the controversy?  Possibly is has to do with the problem 
> of nested contexts.  The
> most general solutions allow contexts to contain other contexts.  If 
> the named graph solution
> allows one to apply a name to a subgraph of another graph, then it is 
> supporting exactly the same kind of
> nesting.  The named document solution does not support nesting.


Sorry, could you clarify that last point - if you can refer to a graph 
through the URI of the container document, then surely can't that URI be 
used in another graph/document?
[accepting all provisos about the approach being a bit hacky]

-- 

Raw
http://dannyayers.com