Re: Reification - whats best practice?

Dan Brickley wrote:

>This is a bit of a hack, but in the noble tradition of adding a layer of
>indirection to solve a problem. Instead of talking directly about
>triples or a graph, you talk about (using whatever RDF vocab you find
>appropriate) a document that has that stuff written in it.
>  
>

Hmm, how would you say the resource/representations divide lines up 
against named graphs? Is it safe to partially collapse the indirection 
and say the graph (in the document) is a representation of the resource? 
I suppose what I'm wondering about is how you would describe the 
indirection for reasoning purposes (without disappearing into a reified 
black hole).

Cheers,
Danny.

-- 

Raw
http://dannyayers.com