On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:56:31 +0200 (CEST), Karsten Otto <otto@math.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > ... and you can even get them quite easily into RDF/XML, simply by > allowing rdf:about/rdf:ID/rdf:nodeID on the <rdf:RDF> wrapper. > Although there are some good arguments for a completetly different > serialization syntax such as TriX... We thought of that. But slipping in such a huge change to RDF in an existing syntax wasn't where we ended up. I noticed that Named Graphs extends RDF in at least two ways: 1) RDF triple subjects can be literals 2) RDF triples are quads (sic) so it's really Named non-RDF Graphs. For reference, RDF triples are defined at http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/#dfn-rdf-triple starting "An RDF triple contains three components:" DaveReceived on Thursday, 26 August 2004 14:30:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:08 GMT