W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2004

Re: In or out of line?

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 03:51:55 -0400 (EDT)
To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0408030347090.10233@homer.w3.org>

It sounds like what you want to to is have rdf;resources as the object of a
triple (as well as being the predicate).

for example:


http://foo#bar example:contentType example:subhead
eaxmple:subhead rdf:subClass example:heading

so that you can tell that http://foo#bar is a heading of some kind, if you
understand RDF schema but not example:subhead

Right? If so, the answer is yes, this is fine. Just check that the particular
models you make say what you mean - validate the schema, look at its graph,
and then write some examples, and validate those to make sure you don't get
the wrong things merging...

cheers

Chaals

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Libby Miller wrote:

>hi Lisa
>
>On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Lisa Seeman wrote:
>
>> I have a controversial question hear (ok, maybe it is not that controversial)
>>
>> I am thinking of using RDF instances from schema   as objects of a
>triple as appose to being used as predicates.
>> The reason I am doing that is because i want the objects themselves
>to have clear relationships, be extendable etc .
>
>Could you give some specific examples of what you want to do?
>
>Libby
>

Charles McCathieNevile  http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  tel: +61 409 134 136
SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe         fax(france): +33 4 92 38 78 22
 Post:   21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia    or
 W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2004 03:52:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:57 UTC