Jon, thanks. Comments below. Jon Hanna wrote: > > Quoting Jan Algermissen <jalgermissen@topicmapping.com>: > > > My first question is what happens when RDF statements from both camps are > > combined > > and people start noticing that there are two resources being the same thing > > (Canada). > > Well there is only one resource, but multiple URIs, Ah, that I did not know. So resources may 'span across authorities', yes? A single resource can live on different hosts controlled by different authorities, yes? (I expect the REST camp to scream but if they agree, too, so much the better) [...] > You can use either. If your tools know that > <http://www.some.org/countries/canada> <owl:sameIndividualAs> > <http://another.org/public/countries/Canada> . Then they can do the necessary > leg work for you. Ok, fine. Thanks. > > Of course sometimes there can be subtle differences (e.g. "Ireland" the island > vs. "Ireland" the country) and sometimes those differences can be contentious > (e.g. Ireland again). Ok, agreed (I meant the exact same subject 'Canada'). > > You do need to "know" that they two URIs identify the same resource. Sometimes > this will be published somewhere (ideally either or both URIs when dereferenced > would reveal this fact). It might not be that easy to determine though, it > might even be secret (Superman owl:sameIndividualAs Clark Kent, but he doesn't > want anyone to know :) Yes. My concern only was if such knowledge could be accumulated inside the SW to increase its overall knowledge. Jan > > -- > Jon Hanna > <http://www.hackcraft.net/> > "?it has been truly said that hackers have even more words for > equipment failures than Yiddish has for obnoxious people." - jargon.txt -- Jan Algermissen http://www.topicmapping.com Consultant & Programmer http://www.gooseworks.orgReceived on Tuesday, 13 April 2004 14:12:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:06 GMT