Re: Literals representing people?

Patrick Stickler wrote:

> The golden rule, IMO, insofar as portable interchange of knowledge is
> concerned, is to say as much as you can in RDF, so that little or no
> special extra-RDF knowlege is brought to bear by any applications
> on its interpretation.
> 
> If you don't *mean* the value to be a string, but to actually be
> something else (other than just the name of that something else)
> don't use a plain literal.

DoublePlusOne.

Bill de hÓra