I note: >On the other hand, maybe it doesn't matter. An N3 parser will do the right >thing with Pient input (wont it?), and an N3 generator will output Pient >when serializing pure RDF data (will it?). So if you have an N3 parser, >use it. If you don't then knowing you were getting N3 wouldn't help you >very much anyway. Do you have any Pient test data to check out N3 parsers against? #g -- At 00:25 24/09/03 +0100, Sean B. Palmer wrote: >http://esw.w3.org/topic/PieNt >- Pient RDF Serialization > >Hacking on an N-Triples++ or an N3--; goals are to be isomorphic with >RDF/XML and N-Triples (should be able to round-trip), and generally >create a scribblable RDF notation without the added logic features of >N3. > >Feedback welcome--just edit the wiki. > >Cheers, > >-- >Sean B. Palmer, <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> >"phenomicity by the bucketful" - http://miscoranda.com/ ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.orgReceived on Wednesday, 24 September 2003 03:41:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:12 GMT