W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2003

RE: Enumeration in RDF?

From: LYNN,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1) <james.lynn@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:04:21 -0400
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F18E8F03B@xatl02.atl.hp.com>
To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, garret@globalmentor.com, danbri@w3.org
Cc: Art.Barstow@nokia.com, www-rdf-interest@w3.org


-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com [mailto:Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:30 AM
To: garret@globalmentor.com; danbri@w3.org
Cc: Art.Barstow@nokia.com; www-rdf-interest@w3.org;
Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
Subject: RE: Enumeration in RDF?


>Collections, being structures, go contrary to that, as there
>is no formally defined way to merge collections.

Thinking out loud here (not formally defined)- suppose we view a collection
as "known members of a collection" rather than...

>... to somehow have control over the
>defined members of a collection. 

This doesn't, of course, resolve this issue...

>  RDF has no official means of keeping track
of source and/or authority 

Comments?

James
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2003 10:04:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:02 GMT