"RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax" states that there are only plain literals and typed literals, with XMLLiteral being a predefined type of typed literal. Does this mean the following two assertions are semantically equivalent? <rdf:Description> <my:xml parseType="Literal">XML content</my:xml> </rdf:Description> <rdf:Description> <my:xml rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral">XML content</my:xml> </rdf:Description> Thanks, GarretReceived on Saturday, 6 September 2003 18:06:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:02 GMT