W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > October 2003

RE: [Fwd: RDFCore 2nd last call announcement]

From: Hammond, Tony (ELSLON) <T.Hammond@elsevier.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:27:37 +0100
Message-ID: <54A600C436EA694581B93E4BD4D4788A06B73CB0@elslonexc004.eslo.co.uk>
To: 'Brian McBride' <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org

Hi:

I wanted to raise a point about an example application (6.2 PRISM) given in
the RDF Primer. It is my understanding that no RDF schemas have yet been
defined by the PRISM Working Group for use with the PRISM term sets, which
from an RDF POV would render the this application less than optimal.

I have earlier developed an RDF schema for the main PRISM term set and
shared this with a couple of members of the Working Group to get their
feedback. This RDF schema was announced on this list a few months back, see

	
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Jul/0133.html

The RDF schema is currently lodged at

	http://www2.elsevier.co.uk/~tony/spec/rdfs/prism.rdfs 

I am wondering if this lack of RDF schemas undermines the PRISM example
application in the Primer in any way, whether the Primer actually cares if
the applications it discusses are generally useful, and also whether the
draft RDF schema I prepared might be accommodated at some more central
resource repository if it were to be judged of use and after any review.

Thanks,
Tony

Tony Hammond
Advanced Technology Group, Elsevier
32 Jamestown Road, London NW1 7BY, UK

<tel:+44-20-7424-4445>
<mailto:t.hammond@elsevier.com>


-----Original Message-----
From: Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
Sent: 13 October 2003 17:01
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Subject: [Fwd: RDFCore 2nd last call announcement]



Attached is the formal announcement of 2nd last call on the RDFCore WD's.

Brian


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RDFCore 2nd last call announcement
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:57:10 +0100
From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: chairs@w3.org

Ladies and Gentlemen,

The RDFCore WG is pleased to announce the publication on 10 Oct 2003 of
the following second last call WD's:

RDF Primer (ed Frank Manola, Eric Miller)
     http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-primer-20031010/
RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax (ed Graham Klyne, Jeremy Carroll)
     http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-concepts-20031010/
RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) (ed Dave Beckett)
     http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20031010/
RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema (ed Dan Brickley, R.
V. Guha)
    http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-schema-20031010/
RDF Semantics (ed Pat Hayes)
     http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-mt-20031010/
RDF Test Cases (ed Jan Grant, Dave Beckett)
     http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-testcases-20031010/

These documents consolidate feedback received during the first last call
period, beginning in January 2003.  The disposition of comments from
first last call may be found at:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/

HTML diffs between these latest WD's and the first last call WD's and
the prevous WD's can be found at:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/diffs

Comments should be sent to www-rdf-comments@w3.org.  The last call
period ends 2359Z on the 07 November 2003.

Patent disclosures may be found at:
     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/ipr-statements

The decision to advance these documents to last call is minuted at:
     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0071.html

The RDFCore WG seeks feedback from all, but in particular requests
feedback from:

XML Core   (handling of xml:base)
XML Schema (datatypes solution)
URI        (handling of xml:base)
i18n
i14n
XHTML      (relating RDF meta data to XHMTL web pages)
SVG        (relating RDF meta data to SVG web pages)
XMLP       (Carrying RDF over XMLP)
P3P
WAI
WEBONT
RDFIG

As per W3C process the RDFCore WG would like to draw attention to the
formal objections against these WD's listed at:

    http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#Objections

The RDFCore WG would also like to draw attention to one aspect of these
specifications about which there has not been universal consensus,
though no formal objection has been received.  The WG seeks particular
feedback on the handling of whitespace processing of datatype values.

Brian McBride
RDFCore co-chair
Received on Monday, 13 October 2003 12:30:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:02 GMT