W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > October 2003

Re: last word on RDF serialization and QNames?

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:02:04 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20031012220047.00b83020@127.0.0.1>
To: Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

At 13:34 12/10/03 -0700, Garret Wilson wrote:
>I guess that sums it up. My current implementation keeps the original 
>namespace and local names around in the resource classes in case they are 
>needed later, but that's starting to become annoying and goes beyond RDF.

Mine too.  RDF doesn't require this, but neither does it forbid it.

That seems just fine to me.

#g


------------
Graham Klyne
GK@NineByNine.org
Received on Sunday, 12 October 2003 17:03:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:02 GMT