- From: Aredridel <aredridel@nbtsc.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:53:09 -0700
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 08:40, Danny Ayers wrote: > > Well, having a deployment platform that is sensitive to efficiency > > issues (i.e. mobile phones), I'd just as soon not leave such issues > > for "later work". > > Fair enough, but wouldn't this route lead straight to a binary serialization > of RDF? > > Use the existing web architecture, definitely. Trying to extend/bend > > the semantics of the existing verbs, no. > > > > If you're not familiar with URIQA, have a look at > > http://sw.nokia.com/uriqa/URIQA.html > > to see how I've been approaching this problem. > > If you can GET why is there a need for MGET? Agreed. The biggest problem with MGET is: What do you do when you want metadata about metadata? MMGET? MMMGET? MMMMMGET?
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 12:55:44 UTC