W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2003

RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents

From: Aredridel <aredridel@nbtsc.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:53:09 -0700
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Message-Id: <1069264389.15273.9.camel@betelgeuse.theinternetco.net>

On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 08:40, Danny Ayers wrote:
> > Well, having a deployment platform that is sensitive to efficiency
> > issues (i.e. mobile phones), I'd just as soon not leave such issues
> > for "later work".
> 
> Fair enough, but wouldn't this route lead straight to a binary serialization
> of RDF?
> > Use the existing web architecture, definitely. Trying to extend/bend
> > the semantics of the existing verbs, no.
> >
> > If you're not familiar with URIQA, have a look at
> > http://sw.nokia.com/uriqa/URIQA.html
> > to see how I've been approaching this problem.
> 
> If you can GET why is there a need for MGET?

Agreed.

The biggest problem with MGET is:

	What do you do when you want metadata about metadata? 

MMGET? MMMGET? MMMMMGET?
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 12:55:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:03 GMT