W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2003

What is the most common type of collection or container?

From: Jimmy <jimbobbs@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:20:52 -0500
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000201c3a74a$68cfc050$0e9828d0@drsoong>

What has everyone found to be the most common type of collection or
container used in real-world RDF documents?  I've mainly used rdf:Seq or
rdf:Bag.  I understand the use for rdf:Alt, but I really haven't seen much
use of collection graphs.  I'm interested to hear about other experiences.

As an aside, one thing that annoys me about the revised RDF/XML syntax is
the inconsistent use of abbreviations.  A sequence element is "Seq", while a
description element is spelled out.  Items in a container use the HTML name,
"li", which doesn't really mean "list item" anymore; I'd rather call the
element "item".  I know this is a nitpick, but how about some consistency in
naming things?


--
Jimmy Cerra

] "A good decision is based on knowledge 
]  and not on numbers" - Plato
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 00:21:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:03 GMT