W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > May 2003

Re: Is rdfs:Resource always implied?

From: Ian Davis <iand@internetalchemy.org>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 09:44:52 +0100
Message-ID: <1592125396.20030530094452@internetalchemy.org>
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

On Friday, 30 May 2003 at 01:26, Jimmy Cerra wrote:

> Since the spec says that everything in RDF is a resource, would the
> above graph also imply the statement (which is the same one as before):

> #foo <rdf:type> <rdfs:Resource>
Yes. This is described at the end of the new RDF Model Theory draft
(http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#rdfs_entail). Entailment rdfs4a says
that if you have a triple of the form xxx aaa yyy . then you add
another triple: xxx rdf:type rdfs:Resource .

- Ian <iand@internetalchemy.org>
"Minds are like books - they work best when open"
Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 04:44:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:45 UTC