> Do folks find it > useful in its current form? is that formulation a correct translation of RDF/RDFS semantics ? see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003May/0074.html FrancescoReceived on Thursday, 15 May 2003 09:25:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:59 GMT