[Danny Ayers > What is also possible given such a setup is that the inference engine could > be used to draw further conclusions, or prompt actions based whether or not > (loc inside box) is true. > > Like I said earlier, the good bit is that (on the OWL/RDF side) this is all > built from standard, reusable parts. The application wiring (and state) can > all be expressed declaratively. > Yes, I think that this is one of the the main points to be made in favor of RDF/OWL/etc. Roger says he is looking for "a" compelling story to sell OWL, but I see several threads here. 1) Potential value of declarative approach. 2) Potential value of ontologies. 3) Potential value of RDF/OWL. If you have 1) and 2), then you have a strong case for 3) from the standard, reusable features. If you do not have the first two, then the case for the third is much weaker. Cheers, Tom PReceived on Friday, 27 June 2003 09:13:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:59 GMT