Hi Danny, Danny Ayers wrote: > > An application could easily do just that - it's only simple arithmetic > after all. Consider the application a service, orthogonal to the > logic. The difficult part is expressing the information in an > well as the input data you have unambiguous fashion that could be > shared amongst the applications. As here, presumably you would need a > way of expressing the result returned from a SWS, A isInside B or > whatever - thanks RDF/XML. Thus far in what you've described there is no use of RDFS- or OWL-ontologies. > To reason with this you'd presumably need > to be able to state things like {X isInside A} disJointFrom > {Y isInside A} - thanks OWL. I am sorry, I'm not following this. What information is being utilized from OWL? How is "disjointFrom" being utilized? Could you elaborate please? /RogerReceived on Tuesday, 24 June 2003 10:27:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:59 GMT