RE: XML Enriched N-Triples (XENT)

> > The TAG finding says that parsing costs of QNames in PCDATA may be
> > high. I've proved that, for Python and SAX and least, the opposite
is
> > true.
> 
> Agreed. And Qnames in element content have  higher cost (imo).

What about QNames in attribute values?  What's the cost for that like?
I'm considering using a QName-like [1] syntax for the design of a markup
language (in progress).

--
Jimmy Cerra

] "I have learned these days, never to limit
]  anyone else due to my own limited
]  imagination." - Dr. Mae C. Jemison

[1] I don't want to use Qualified Names, as they are, because the syntax
of a QName may be confused with that of an URI.