- From: Jimmy Cerra <jimbobbs@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:51:22 -0400
- To: "'Bill de hÓra'" <dehora@eircom.net>, "'Sean B. Palmer'" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> > The TAG finding says that parsing costs of QNames in PCDATA may be > > high. I've proved that, for Python and SAX and least, the opposite is > > true. > > Agreed. And Qnames in element content have higher cost (imo). What about QNames in attribute values? What's the cost for that like? I'm considering using a QName-like [1] syntax for the design of a markup language (in progress). -- Jimmy Cerra ] "I have learned these days, never to limit ] anyone else due to my own limited ] imagination." - Dr. Mae C. Jemison [1] I don't want to use Qualified Names, as they are, because the syntax of a QName may be confused with that of an URI.
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2003 20:51:30 UTC