W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > June 2003

Re: A problem with OWL Validator

From: Monika Solanki <monika@dmu.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:33:49 +0100
Message-ID: <3EED64CD.6050107@dmu.ac.uk>
To: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
CC: semanticweb <semanticweb@yahoogroups.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org, www-ws@w3.org
It is

http://owl.bbn.com/validator/


Jos De_Roo wrote:

>
>can you give a pointer to "the validator"?
>is it http://owl.bbn.com/validator/ ?
>is it http://phoebus.cs.man.ac.uk:9999/OWL/Validator ?
>
>--
>Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
>
>
>                                                                                                                   
>                    Monika Solanki                                                                                 
>                    <monika@dmu.ac       To:     Jos De_Roo/AMDUS/MOR/Agfa-NV/BE/BAYER@AGFA                        
>                    .uk>                 cc:     semanticweb <semanticweb@yahoogroups.com>,                        
>                    Sent by:              www-rdf-interest@w3.org, www-ws@w3.org                                   
>                    www-ws-request       Subject:     Re: A problem with OWL Validator                             
>                    @w3.org                                                                                        
>                                                                                                                   
>                                                                                                                   
>                    2003-06-15                                                                                     
>                    02:44 PM                                                                                       
>                                                                                                                   
>                                                                                                                   
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Thanks for your reply. This is exactly what I thought. However, the
>validator does not think so. It keeps on throwing warning messages, if I
>include instances. Is this to be considered a design issue with the
>validator?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Monika
>
>Jos De_Roo wrote:
>
>>Hi Monika, conceptually there should be no problem
>>to mix RDF instance data and OWL ontologies.
>>In my experience I even mix it with log: and math:
>>formulae (using N3) to find proofs etc...
>>
>>--
>>Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
>>
>>
>>
>
>>                   Monika Solanki
>>
>
>>                   <monika@dmu.ac       To:     www-ws@w3.org,
>>
>www-rdf-interest@w3.org, semanticweb
>
>>                   .uk>                  <semanticweb@yahoogroups.com>
>>
>
>>                   Sent by:             cc:
>>
>
>>                   www-ws-request       Subject:     A problem with OWL
>>
>Validator
>
>>                   @w3.org
>>
>
>
>
>>                   2003-06-15
>>
>
>>                   12:56 PM
>>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I have an OWL file, in which I have included some instances as well. When
>>
>I
>
>>parse the file without the instances, it does not give me any error,
>>however when I do it with  instances, it gives me loads of warning like,
>>Implicit Property, Undefined Resource, Invalid namespace. I fail to
>>understand if my ontology is wrongly written or is it wrong to include
>>instances in the same file. Has anyone come across such errors before.
>>
>>Please Help.
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Monika
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
 >**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<
Monika Solanki
De Montfort University
Software Technology Research Laboratory
Hawthorn building, H00.18
The Gateway.
Leicester LE1 9BH, UK

phone: +44 (0)116 250 6170 intern: 6170
email: monika@dmu.ac.uk <mailto:monika@dmu.ac.uk>
web: http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~monika/ 
<http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/%7Emonika/>
 >**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<
"NOTE: The information transmitted is intended only for the person or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or 
privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by 
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If 
you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the 
material from any computer"
Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 02:27:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:59 GMT