Hi, Is it correct to make forward references in a RDF Notation3 description? Something like this, (...) cims:aggregation rdf:domain cims:Meta_Association (...) cims:Meta_Association rdf:type cims:Meta_NamedElement (...) The cims:Meta_Association is used before being described. Can this be application dependent? I can't find anything regarding this subject in the present RDF docs (W3C working drafts, etc). Also, is there any guidelines how should comments appear in a RDF file (C/C++ driven)? Is this an application (implementation) issue? Thanks, -- Pedro passis@dee.isep.ipp.pt | Tel. +351 22 8340500 Ext. 1712Received on Friday, 18 July 2003 13:41:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:00 GMT