In Mike Dean's formal objection to the Datatyping Solution proposed in the Jan 23 LC WD docs [1], one of the alternate proposals he suggests is: [[ an RDF datatyping approach that includes global datatyping (as in Proposal F from [4]) possibly with optional local datatyping ]] Did the RDF Core WG consider such an option (to support both local and global datatyping)? If so, why was it rejected? Regards, Art Barstow --- [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0173.htmlReceived on Tuesday, 28 January 2003 09:01:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:06 GMT