W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2003

Re: RDFIG chats in ntriples

From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:04:49 -0800
Message-ID: <3E2594B1.9070900@robustai.net>
To: James Michael DuPont <mdupont777@yahoo.com>
CC: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org

James Michael DuPont wrote:

>Oh, no! Google does not do RDF!
>I will write to them, asking them to index the rdf files...
>google labs.... cool
>
I guess not.  When new RDF files are published, if we refer to them in 
our blogs, then Googel will pick them up.  The document  could be 
described in the item description,-  one item, one document - and the 
link would be the URI of the document.  We could standardize on one key 
word for these kinds of entires --- say "rdfDocument".  If everybody did 
that it would help discovery and we could find them all with a Google 
search for rdfDocument +<keywords>.  To go beyond Googel and index the 
rdf:Resources inside the the documents, we will need some other 
(hopefully distributed) search mechinism of the actual triples.   
 Anyway , you've  compiled some great data :) ..... I just hope it dont 
get lost in the scuffle.  

... hi Mdupont, remember me ?

Seth Russell
http://radio.weblogs.com/0113759/
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 12:05:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:57 GMT