> That very much depends on what you want to do with the resulting RDF. Indeed. > Unfortunately, emacs still seems to be a popular choice for the hardcore > RDF writer. Not vi? I'm staggered... Dave Beckett has a good list of RDF resources, which includes tools: http://www.ilrt.bristol.ac.uk/discovery/rdf/resources/ I note that you are using Jena - it can be quick & comparatively easy to knock together a few method calls with this and serialise the model, very reusable. Copy & paste followed by checking with IsaViz (or whatever) isn't a bad approach either. I'm assuming here that you're talking about RDF/XML, as people seem to be able to type out n3 happily without fancy tools - this would be another option, just run the n3 through cwm or Jena to get the XML version. Cheers, Danny.Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 16:14:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:07 GMT