W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > December 2003

RE: Trust, Context, Justification and Quintuples

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:31:16 +0100
To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDKEHOCCAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>

> 2) The interpretation of a reified statement is not well defined.  For
> example, it is NOT a representation for any actual triple in the data
> store, and it is NOT considered "asserted"... So what is a reified
> statement and how should it relate to the other triples?
>

No that goes too far - the interpretation of a reified statement is clearly
defined by RDF Semantics - but this differs from the applications that
reification is often used for. That was the best the WG could do and it is a
known limitation with the current round of RDF. That's why thing like
contexts ended up in the postponed pile.

Jeremy
Received on Friday, 19 December 2003 07:32:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:03 GMT