W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > December 2003

RE: Properties in OWL

From: Adrian Walker <adrianw@snet.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:53:54 -0500
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20031209164159.03476940@pop.snet.net>
To: "Yongchun Gao" <yongchun.gao@mail.mcgill.ca>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

Hi Yongchun  -

You may be interested in the example OntologyInterop2, which is live online 
at www.reengineeringllc.com.  It illustrates how to reason about units and 
to convert between them when necessary.

The notation is different from OWL (more end-user-ish).  But it allows all 
sorts of useful inferences that do not seem to be possible in OWL itself.

                                 Cheers,   -- Adrian


                                            INTERNET BUSINESS LOGIC

                                              www.reengineeringllc.com

Dr. Adrian Walker
Reengineering LLC
PO Box 1412
Bristol
CT 06011-1412 USA

Phone: USA 860 583 9677
Cell:    USA  860 830 2085
Fax:    USA  860 314 1029



At 11:58 AM 12/9/03 -0500, you wrote:
>Just follow your question: I have the same feeling.
>
>For example: suppose there is a property HasYield (integer), but what 
>about the unit this property is using,(Kg, g, etc.)? It is the quesion of 
>property about property.
>
>Could OWL figure out this situation?
>
>Thanks in advance!
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:justo.ruiz@activiti.com>Justo Ruiz
>To: <mailto:www-rdf-logic@w3.org>www-rdf-logic@w3.org
>Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 1:05 PM
>Subject: Properties in OWL
>
>
>All,
>
>I've been following OWL language evolution for a while and ever
>since I learnt about it, I had a question on my mind which I still
>haven't found a solution or explanation:  Why Properties cannot have
>properties?  That is, why is it not possible to decorate a property with
>attributes and associations (using the UML terminology)?  I found this
>very frustrating as, for example, a simple mapping between a UML
>Association Class and a OWL Property is not possible.
>
>Thanks in advance for your clarifications.
>
>Regards,
>
>
>
>Justo Ruiz Ferrer.
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2003 16:49:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:03 GMT