Re: practical problems with rdf:parseType="Collection" implementation

From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:32:27 +0100 To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org Message-ID: <20030814083227.GC4141@ecs.soton.ac.uk> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:11 GMT

On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 05:09:12 -0700, Garret Wilson wrote:
> The design of rdf:List looks good in theory, but there are a few details 
> that make it a pain to implement---particularly, the way rdf#nil is used:

Its also quite awkward to query for, eg. in RDQL. I guess we need some
kind of idiom that means is a memeber of this list. Theres nothing that
logically comes from the structure though, unlike with collections.

- Steve