W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2003

Re: Alternatives to XML for RDF?

From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:34:30 -0700
Message-ID: <001901c360f8$0d45cce0$bd7ba8c0@rhm8200>
To: "Jon Hanna" <jon@spin.ie>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

I try to use Q-names or unqualified names where possible
(because it greatly enhances readability).
That's one reason that I like interfacing to the RDF world
through TAP.  TAP has a neat facility for managing the
URIs.

Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jon Hanna" <jon@spin.ie>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 9:39 AM
Subject: RE: Alternatives to XML for RDF?


> 
> > I just skimmed through the Adenine paper.
> > It certainly is easier to read than XML,
> > but it's a far cry from MKR.
> > 
> > MKR was specifically designed to be English-like
> > for easy readability.
> > 
> > MKR is also UNIX-shell-like which makes for 
> > easy integration with Linux & Windows commands.
> 
> Where do URIs fit into MKR?
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2003 13:34:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:01 GMT